US Father names son 'Version 2.0'
Triumph of the geeks, ladies and gentlemen. Triumph of the geeks. It was only a matter of time.
Question is, though...if some dude is enough of a geek to want to name his child Jon Blake Cusack 2.0 (and, yes, note the significance that the guy is named Jon Cusack), how did he manage to reproduce himself in the first place? And WHERE DID HE FIND THE WOMAN?
Jon Cusack 1.0, if you are reading this now, please write to me at pegritz {at} hotmail.com and tell me the secret way to the Land of Incredibly Geeky Yet Still Hot Women. I will be forever in your debt.
Triumph of the geeks, ladies and gentlemen. Triumph of the geeks. It was only a matter of time.
Question is, though...if some dude is enough of a geek to want to name his child Jon Blake Cusack 2.0 (and, yes, note the significance that the guy is named Jon Cusack), how did he manage to reproduce himself in the first place? And WHERE DID HE FIND THE WOMAN?
Jon Cusack 1.0, if you are reading this now, please write to me at pegritz {at} hotmail.com and tell me the secret way to the Land of Incredibly Geeky Yet Still Hot Women. I will be forever in your debt.
Re: Dork, not geek
Date: 2004-02-06 06:52 pm (UTC)I realize now, though, that I fall very squarely on the "dork" side of the equation, since my geek skillz are certainly not up to par, unless you count being a Lovecraft geek, at which point they are, quite literally, off the scale.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-06 06:39 pm (UTC)who said she was hot? Really, woman might look like a water buffalo with a bad case of the pox.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-06 06:53 pm (UTC)Chances are, though, that he just found her lying behind a dumpster in the back of the local CompUSA. *le sigh*