Today's Great Disappointment
Sep. 12th, 2005 04:59 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Afterculture Art - An Anthropology of the Future
This site could have bee brilliant. The conception os simple, but elegant, and scientifically-defensible: design an anthropologically realistic portrayal of the various cultures of "New Native Americans," the lowtech survivors of our present hightech civilization's fall. The initial image you encounter on the page is beautiful and thoughtful: a greeneyed, but somewhat darkskinned, woman in a heavy, sarape-like covering with Native American-esque bead jewelry centered on a salvaged VW hood ornament pendant. Awesome! Post-apocalyptic anthrolopology at its finest!
Wrong.
Just beneath the picture starts the useless neohippy, neopagan "back to the Earth Mother" bullshit:
This is a glimpse of "a future that works:"
sustainable, simple, sacred--and
anthropologically defensible.
But it's not the only possible way we could live:
the Afterculture signals a return to the rich
"cultural biodiversity" that has characterized the
human species for most of its sojourn here, and the
viewer is challenged to imagine other versions,
other tribes.
Ummmmm. No. The main hypothesis here is that this "future society" will evolve out of ours by natural cultural evolution, not the apocalyptic ending of our own civilization. What MORON will trade the technologies and abilities we have to day to go back to sitting in longhuts, listening to the old women of the tribe babble about birthin' them babies and the Corn Mother, and building farming implements out of pieces of old cars? A civilization like this could certainly evolve in the wake of, say, a major civilization-destroying war or plague, or could easily be what remnant "amish" Luddites and those too poor or too isolated to take part in a technological Singularity, a gradual conversion of "first world" civilization to an uploaded virtual state, or some other form of technologically-based evolutionary moment could form in the shadows of posthumanity's processor monoliths or whatnot...but, dear gods, I am so horribly sick of "back to the Earth" predictions of sustainable societies, matriarchal utopianism, and antitechnological mysticism. Humanity has grown beyond that crap; only a major planetary disaster like an asteroid strike could potentially eliminate the bleeding edge of human technological evolution--at which point, survivors would very likely sink back into ecologically-sustainable farming or hunting-and-gathering societies just for the sake of basic survival. THAT could happen. But everyone one day deciding...ohhh, we're sick of a world run by those brutish and evil MEN with their cars and their strip mining and their machines that are an affront to the Harvest Crone, so let's just scrap civilization and go back to being Iroquois?
FAT. FUCKING. CHANCE.
I say: "Go listen to the Talking Heads, 'Nothing But Flowers' and THEN hit me up with your la-la rhetoric of macrobiotics and virgin-sacrifice, you filthy fucking hippies. Enjoy what's left of the planet when the rest of us become machines and leave this cruddy, polluted ball of mud."
This site could have bee brilliant. The conception os simple, but elegant, and scientifically-defensible: design an anthropologically realistic portrayal of the various cultures of "New Native Americans," the lowtech survivors of our present hightech civilization's fall. The initial image you encounter on the page is beautiful and thoughtful: a greeneyed, but somewhat darkskinned, woman in a heavy, sarape-like covering with Native American-esque bead jewelry centered on a salvaged VW hood ornament pendant. Awesome! Post-apocalyptic anthrolopology at its finest!
Wrong.
Just beneath the picture starts the useless neohippy, neopagan "back to the Earth Mother" bullshit:
This is a glimpse of "a future that works:"
sustainable, simple, sacred--and
anthropologically defensible.
But it's not the only possible way we could live:
the Afterculture signals a return to the rich
"cultural biodiversity" that has characterized the
human species for most of its sojourn here, and the
viewer is challenged to imagine other versions,
other tribes.
Ummmmm. No. The main hypothesis here is that this "future society" will evolve out of ours by natural cultural evolution, not the apocalyptic ending of our own civilization. What MORON will trade the technologies and abilities we have to day to go back to sitting in longhuts, listening to the old women of the tribe babble about birthin' them babies and the Corn Mother, and building farming implements out of pieces of old cars? A civilization like this could certainly evolve in the wake of, say, a major civilization-destroying war or plague, or could easily be what remnant "amish" Luddites and those too poor or too isolated to take part in a technological Singularity, a gradual conversion of "first world" civilization to an uploaded virtual state, or some other form of technologically-based evolutionary moment could form in the shadows of posthumanity's processor monoliths or whatnot...but, dear gods, I am so horribly sick of "back to the Earth" predictions of sustainable societies, matriarchal utopianism, and antitechnological mysticism. Humanity has grown beyond that crap; only a major planetary disaster like an asteroid strike could potentially eliminate the bleeding edge of human technological evolution--at which point, survivors would very likely sink back into ecologically-sustainable farming or hunting-and-gathering societies just for the sake of basic survival. THAT could happen. But everyone one day deciding...ohhh, we're sick of a world run by those brutish and evil MEN with their cars and their strip mining and their machines that are an affront to the Harvest Crone, so let's just scrap civilization and go back to being Iroquois?
FAT. FUCKING. CHANCE.
I say: "Go listen to the Talking Heads, 'Nothing But Flowers' and THEN hit me up with your la-la rhetoric of macrobiotics and virgin-sacrifice, you filthy fucking hippies. Enjoy what's left of the planet when the rest of us become machines and leave this cruddy, polluted ball of mud."
Re: I'm
Date: 2005-09-13 03:10 am (UTC)DOCTOR FUNKENSTEIN.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-12 11:31 pm (UTC)Lys--been rantin' about this for a while.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-13 03:13 am (UTC)I live in the middle of the fucking woods. I am surrounded in plants and wild animals. I spend a good percentage of every day wandering about and just enjoying the wonder of our planetary ecosystem. BUT I'M NOT A FUCKING EARTHFUCKER! I respect the planet but, at the same time, I'm a tech geek. You CAN BE BOTH!
And I don't care how badly Arnold Schwarzenegger is fucking up in California, I will still vote for him for President because I truly believe he will lead our civilization forward into a glorious Hyperborian Age!
Re: Late Summer Reading
Date: 2005-09-13 03:15 am (UTC)Re: Late Summer Reading
Date: 2005-09-13 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-13 01:12 pm (UTC)back to the earth does not equal feminist hippy ideas. lots of men are into the movement, too, and it doesn't necessarily have to do with any earth-based religion. in a lot of ways, i think it makes sense. yes, i'm also a tech geek, but i can see the benefits of going back to the earth.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-13 03:07 pm (UTC)Hell, you know me...I have this deeprooted psychological need to bitch about something at least once per week. :) This week it was neohippies!
amen, brotha!
Date: 2005-09-13 04:40 pm (UTC)*bows*
well-put!